Hello , could you please help me answer the following questions from the attached court case?

What are the court's decision?

Why did the court rule the way it did?

sufficient to warrant a finding by the trier of the facts that the defendant had, by reason of his position in the corporation, responsibility and authority either to prevent in the first instance, or promptly to correct, the violation complained of, and that he failed to do so. The failure thus to fulfill the duty imposed by the interaction of the corporate agent's authority and that statute furnishes a sufficient causal link. The considerations which prompted the imposition of this duty, and the scope of the duty, provide the measure of culpability.* * United States v. Park, United States Supreme Court 421 U.S. 658 (1975). Reversed in favor of the Government