Hello i need your help in writing a good 600 words response regarding anthropology (nature and ideas)

1. Watch the tv episode "Nosedive" (Black Mirror, Season 3, Episode 1)

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5497778/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nosedive_(Black_Mirror)

2. Read over the prompt below:

The response should include or talk about the following: How does this episode invite us, as viewers, to be "epistemologically ambivalent" about algorithms? Thinking about the characters, how does the show stage the dramas of seductive knowledge, especially in terms of algorithmic knowledge? Are there specific examples of the feedback loops that algorithms give rise to that seem particularly significant, epistemologically? Thinking about your own life, do you recognize anything in this episode from your own experiences and your own social world? Feel absolutely free to draw on reflections from your own life; this kind of concrete "data" can be really useful, when it comes to theoretical reflection like this. (For example, is there a specific form of social media that you participate in, one that perhaps echoes some of the depiction in this episode?). This prompt is really about what you think the show is trying to do, in terms of epistemologically, but if if feels more useful, philosophically, you can also simply focus on your own interpretation of the episode as a viewer. This assignment can be written in the first-person, if this suits your analysis.

Here are some moments in the episode that might prove useful for your reflections: Lacie, the main character, points to the authority of algorithms in her social world, identifying it as a numbers game. At a critical point in the episode, she explains, "Until I get there, I have to play the numbers game. We all do. That's what we're in. That's how the f*cking world works." It's useful to notice how the episode depicts scientists and their proxies or representatives. For example, on a tour of an apartment, Lacie is told by the realtor that she'll only qualify for the Prime Influencers Program if she is at least a 4.5 (this would give her a 20% discount). Her brother describes it as a eugenics program, and Lacie responds: "It's a lifestyle community." As another example, Lacie's Reputelligent Coach studies her Rep Report analytics: "Let's check on your sphere of influence... Well, most of your interactions are confined to your inner circle, and they're largely, pardon the term, mid- to low- range folks. Same with your outer circle. You've got a ton of reciprocal five stars from service industry workers, but there's not much else." She needs up-votes from quality people: "High fours. Impress those up-scale folks, you'll gain velocity on your arc and there's your boost." It's also useful to notice the specific feedback loops that this show is dramatizing: Lacie's picked up by a truck driver, who's a 4.1: "Tom was a 4.3. They gave his bed to a 4.4. So when he died, I thought, fuck it. I started saying what I wanted, when I wanted. Just drop it out there. People don't always like that. It is incredible how fast you slip off the ladder when you start doing that." Lacie's coach tells her: "In terms of quality, you could use a punch up right there. Ideally, that's up votes from quality people.... But don't try so hard: it's impossible to respect. High Fours can smell it a mile off. Authentic gestures, that's the key." Lacie's old friend, Naomi, tells her not to come to the wedding, after all: "When I asked you to speak, you were a 4.2, okay? And the authenticity of a vintage bond, Low Four at a gathering of this calibre played fantastically on all the simulations we ran. Forecast was a prestige bounce of .2 minimum. But now you're a sub three. Sorry, that just puts the stink on things a little too much. That just plays badly for us. In the final scene, Lacie's shouting with her cell neighbour, who declares, "Don't wonder? It would be a dull world without wonder.