Hello,

Please help us with True or False questions correct answerss.

6. Duties and rights coexist. No right exists in one person

without a corresponding duty resting on some other

person or persons. True or False

7. The rights given in the U.S. Constitution are rights that cannot

Be taken away or violated by any statutes, ordinances, or court

decisions. True or False

8. One very important individual legal right is the right of privacy, which has three components. True or False

9. The first component of the right of privacy is to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. T or F

10. The following is the Fourth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or things to be seized.

True or False

11. A police officer may search a home without reasonable suspicion that a crime has occurred. True or False

12. If your home or business is searched unlawfully, any items obtained during the unlawful search could be excluded as evidence in a criminal trial because of the 4^th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. True or False

13. In the bank robbery example from class discussion, the homeowner may be arrested by the police for smoking an illegal substance.

True or False

14. FACTS: Rodney Gant was arrested for driving with a suspended license and handcuffed in the back seat of the squad car of the arresting officers. After handcuffing Mr. Gant, the arresting officers searched his car and found cocaine in the pocket of a jacket lying on the back seat of Gants vehicle. Mr. Gant was charged with possession of cocaine (as well as the driving with a suspended license).

Mr. Gant's lawyer challenged the search of his client's vehicle on the grounds that there were not exigent circumstances. That is, locked in and handcuffed as he was, there was no emergency or reason to believe that Mr. Gant would spring into action and hide, destroy, or swallow the cocaine. As a result, his lawyer argued that the officers needed a warrant. Without the warrant, his lawyer argued, the cocaine could not be used as evidence in the case.

The cocaine evidence was admitted and Mr. Gant was convicted and appealed. The Court of Appeals of Arizona reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted Arizona's petition for certiorari, and subsequently vacated and remanded. The Court of Appeals of Arizona remanded for evidentiary hearing on legality of warrantless search. On remand, the trial court found no violation. Defendant appealed again. The Court of Appeals of Arizona reversed the decision and the Supreme Court of Arizona affirmed that reversal. Arizona appealed.

What is the issue?

a. There was no warrantless search of the vehicle

b. There was a warrantless search of the vehicle

c. Was the warrantless search of the vehicle lawful or

a violation of Gants Fourth Amendment rights?

d. A and B are both correct

e. None of the above

15. A second aspect of the right of privacy protects individuals against intrusions by others. True or False

16. A constitution is a body of principles that establishes the structure

of a government and the relationship of that government to the

people who are governed. True or False

17. John Roberts is the present Chief Justice of the United States

Supreme Court. True or False