Hey I believe I got this question wrong can you please guide me through the process and tell me what where the correct answers?Thank you

Question 7 0 / 0.1 points Based on this SPSS output: Correlations harsh sibling Number of people in reactive proactive discipline size the household aggression aggression harsh discipline Pearson Correlation Sig. (2- tailed) 349 sibling size Pearson OSS Correlation Sig. (2- .311 tailed) 347 363 Number of people in Pearson 007 .373" the household Correlation Sig. (2- 903 .000 tailed) N 347 361 363 reactive aggression Pearson 323" 093 .005 Correlation Sig. (2- 000 .076 .919 tailed) N 349 363 363 368 proactive aggression Pearson (222" . 188** 117' .562 Correlation Sig. (2 1000 .000 .042 .000 tailed) 344 354 354 360 360 *. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). Interpret the coefficient between number of people in the household and proactive regression, select all correct answers. There is a statistically significant correlation between number of people in the household and proactive aggression and it is positive and with a small magnitude. There is not a statistically significant correlation between number of people in the household and proactive aggression and it is positive and with a small magnitude. The more people live in the household with the individual, the higher this individual's proactive aggression is. The more people live in the household with the individual, the lower this individual's proactive aggression is. Question 8 0.1 /0.1 points Based on this SPSS output: Correlations harsh sibling Number of people in reactive proactive