How could this source be classified? $($Chapter $8\mathrm{.}1\text{'}$s discussion of primary vs secondary sources is important here$)$

A very highly educated journalist interviews a researcher from UCLA about the research she has done.

The journalist then publishes the interview to YouTube.

The published interview has no edits, no changes, no interpretation $--$ it is raw footage of the interview. On YouTube, anyone can see the interviewer's questions and the interviewee's complete, unedited responses. There is no analysis, summary, interpretation.

This interview can be considered a

primary popular source

primary secondary source

primary tertiary source

scholarly popular source

secondary scholarly source

popular secondary scholarship source