How does the policy evaluation stage often cause the policymaking process to start all over again? $q,$ The evaluation stage can identify new problems, leading to another round of agenda setting, policy selection, and so on$.$

Policymakers realize that all enacted policies inevitably create additional new problems for society, which must then be addressed with further policies.

Policies are typically unsuccessful in solving the problems they attempt to solve, so they have to be continuously tweaked through the policymaking process.

The multistep process of policymaking must always be followed several times to make sure every policy is refined until it's the best it can possibly be$.$