1. How might social role stereotypes explain the interaction? Is there any evidence of descriptive or prescriptive prejudices?
2. Discuss the extent to which Jim is able to use emotional intelligence to facilitate transformational leadership. Is he more of a transformational leader or transactional? What evidence do you have?
3. What message design logic does Ashlee rely on? Carol? How about Jim? 
4. Assess the extent to which the axioms are present in the case. What generational variations might have played a role in the conflict?
5. What ethical dilemmas emerge? How can any of the theories help navigate these ethical issues?
6. Which theory seems to explain the situation better than the others? Why do you believe this to be the case? Are there other theories or a combination of theories that might explain what happened more fully?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

To address the questions raised lets analyze each one in turn 1 Social role stereotypes and interaction Social role stereotypes can shape how individu... View the full answer