How to Calculate the use for planning materiality? how do figure out the percentage for planning materiality
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
How to Calculate the use for planning materiality? how do figure out the percentage for planning materiality and give answers for the answers for excel boxes in yellow.
Transcribed Image Text:
Account Name Cash and cash equivalents Receivables, net Inventory Prepaid expenses Deferred income tax benefits Property, Plant, & Equipment Accumulated depreciation and amortization Intangibles, net Lines of credit Accounts payable & Reserve for returns Accrued liabilities & Accrued profit sharing Income taxes payable & Deferred income taxes Common stock, 26,121 shares issued 2021 Planning Materiality (from work paper 3-7) Ratio of Total Tolerable Misstatement to Planning Materiality *** $48,978 $12,875 $122,337 $17,772 $7,132 $206,426 $85,986 $423 $11,011 $68,399 $28,270 $18,057 $261 $5,460 $20,740 Donated capital Additional paid-in capital Deferred compensation Accumulated other comprehensive income Retained earnings Treasury stock, 6,546 and 6,706 shares at cost, respectively Total Amount of Tolerable Misstatement Allocated To Balance Sheet Accounts ($79) $3,883 $317,907 ($143,950) EARTHWEAR CLOTHIERS Allocation of Materiality: Tolerable Misstatements December 31, 2022 (In thousands) 2022 Unaudited Trial Balance $79,359 $8,643 $147,693 $15,647 $10,338 $223,736 $97,722 $1,734 $10,510 $60,286 $33.600 $24,567 $261 $5,460 $25,719 ($36) $2,173 $361,402 ($134,512) Tolerable Misstatement $2,368 $2,368 $1,578 $1,578 $65 $1,365 $1,578 $0 $543 Not Applicable $1,578 $13,023 $3,157 4.1 Tolerable Misstatement as % of Account Balance ** Planning Materiality 0% 0% 75% 0% 75% 50% 0% 0% 50% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% 23% 1% 0% 0% 15% 0% 0% 0% 25% 43% 25% 50% 6% 0% 0% 25% 17% Not Applicable Not Applicable 50% 1% Explanation Large and complex account with misstatements expected, costly to audit Relatively complex, estimation involved, related to Deferred Income Taxes Relatively little change from prior year, not difficult to audit Relatively little volume, not difficult to audit via 3rd party info No change from prior year, easily verified No change from prior year, easily verified Little change from prior year, not difficult to audit Not difficult to audit, examine current year vesting activity Involves some complex applications of GAAP Not Applicable Little change from prior year, not difficult to audit Init 1/ Account Name Cash and cash equivalents Receivables, net Inventory Prepaid expenses Deferred income tax benefits Property, Plant, & Equipment Accumulated depreciation and amortization Intangibles, net Lines of credit Accounts payable & Reserve for returns Accrued liabilities & Accrued profit sharing Income taxes payable & Deferred income taxes Common stock, 26,121 shares issued 2021 Planning Materiality (from work paper 3-7) Ratio of Total Tolerable Misstatement to Planning Materiality *** $48,978 $12,875 $122,337 $17,772 $7,132 $206,426 $85,986 $423 $11,011 $68,399 $28,270 $18,057 $261 $5,460 $20,740 Donated capital Additional paid-in capital Deferred compensation Accumulated other comprehensive income Retained earnings Treasury stock, 6,546 and 6,706 shares at cost, respectively Total Amount of Tolerable Misstatement Allocated To Balance Sheet Accounts ($79) $3,883 $317,907 ($143,950) EARTHWEAR CLOTHIERS Allocation of Materiality: Tolerable Misstatements December 31, 2022 (In thousands) 2022 Unaudited Trial Balance $79,359 $8,643 $147,693 $15,647 $10,338 $223,736 $97,722 $1,734 $10,510 $60,286 $33.600 $24,567 $261 $5,460 $25,719 ($36) $2,173 $361,402 ($134,512) Tolerable Misstatement $2,368 $2,368 $1,578 $1,578 $65 $1,365 $1,578 $0 $543 Not Applicable $1,578 $13,023 $3,157 4.1 Tolerable Misstatement as % of Account Balance ** Planning Materiality 0% 0% 75% 0% 75% 50% 0% 0% 50% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% 23% 1% 0% 0% 15% 0% 0% 0% 25% 43% 25% 50% 6% 0% 0% 25% 17% Not Applicable Not Applicable 50% 1% Explanation Large and complex account with misstatements expected, costly to audit Relatively complex, estimation involved, related to Deferred Income Taxes Relatively little change from prior year, not difficult to audit Relatively little volume, not difficult to audit via 3rd party info No change from prior year, easily verified No change from prior year, easily verified Little change from prior year, not difficult to audit Not difficult to audit, examine current year vesting activity Involves some complex applications of GAAP Not Applicable Little change from prior year, not difficult to audit Init 1/
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
It appears you need help understanding how to calculate tolerable misstatement as a percentage of planning materiality and completing the related details for the yellow cells in an Excel table pertain... View the full answer
Related Book For
Auditing A Practical Approach
ISBN: 9780730382645
4th Edition
Authors: Robyn Moroney, Fiona Campbell, Jane Hamilton
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these accounting questions
-
Over the past few years, our client, a retail bank, has gone national from a few branches in one state to 200 branches across the country. Although some of the branches performing well, the company...
-
A decline in the aggregate demand has led to a decline in output in the economy equal to $10 billion. Government wants to counter this recession by reducing income taxes. Assuming that the marginal...
-
You are choosing between three classes to complete your requirements for general education credits. Class A meets from 2:30-4:00 PM on T, Th. The required text costs $130. Class B meets at the same...
-
In mining engineering, holes are often drilled through rock using drill bits. As a drill hole gets deeper, additional rods are added to the drill bit to enable additional drilling to take place. It...
-
The pipe lies in the horizontal plane. If it is subjected to a vertical force \(\mathbf{P}\) at its end, determine the strain energy due to bending and torsion. Express the results in terms of the...
-
Selected journal entries for the Joel Berges Company are presented in BE2-7. In BE2-7, selected transactions for the Joel Berges Company are presented in journal form below. Post the transactions to...
-
Two shuffleboard disks of equal mass, one orange and the other yellow, are involved in an elastic, glancing collision. The yellow disk is initially at rest and is struck by the orange disk moving...
-
Suppose that the point spread for a particular sporting event is 10 points and that with this spread you are convinced you would have a 0.60 probability of winning a bet on your team. However, the...
-
Kanye contributed a piece of land (FMV = $300,000; AB = $200,000) in exchange for a 50% capital and profit (and loss) interest in KW Partnership. KW reported the following income and expenses for the...
-
What determines the interest rate in a small open economy?
-
Suppose the supply of oil that had not yet been used was suddenly lost as a result of a rupture in the earth. What would occur?
-
List the categories of transactions that appear in a countrys current account. What is the current account balance? What is the relationship between the current account balance and net exports?
-
Why are there more medical specialists and fewer general practitioners in the United States now than was the case 50 years ago?
-
In Table 11.2, the estimated coefficient on black is 0.084 in column (1), 0.688 in column (2), and 0.389 in column (3). In spite of these large differences, all three models yield similar estimates...
-
QUESTION 3 a) Convert the following expressions to prefix and postfix expression: b) i. ii. P*Q/R+ (S*T/U) Given, (A/B) + (C+D *E*F) Show the sequence of stack configuration in the evaluation of the...
-
Coastal Refining Company operates a refinery with a distillation capacity of 12,000 barrels per day. As a new member of Coastal's management team, you have been given the task of developing a...
-
One of the clients of Bingo Chartered Accountants operates a restaurant. From January of the current year, the business has consistently paid its suppliers late, well in excess of the suppliers...
-
The following factor(s) influences how much and when substantive procedures are performed: (a) The nature of the test. (b) The level of assurance necessary. (c) The type of evidence required. (d) All...
-
Georgia and Chloe are the senior partners in a mid-size audit firm. They have both acted as the lead audit partner at different times with a long-standing audit client, Willow Industries Ltd. The new...
-
Solve Prob. 8-48 using Castigliano's theorem. Data From Problem 8.48 = ABC 6.5(103) mm IBC 100(10) mm+ AAB = 18(10) mm IAR 400(10) mm+ DA = 3 m B -50 kN 1 m
-
Solve Prob. \(8-48\), including the effect of shear and axial strain energy. Data From Problem 8.48 = ABC 6.5(103) mm = = IBC 100(106) mm* AAB - 18(103) mm = TAR 400(10) mm A 3 m B -50 kN 1 m
-
Solve Prob. 8-40 using Castigliano's theorem. Data From Problem 8.40 2 k/ft 8 ft 8 ft B
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App