1. How would an act-utilitarian evaluate his decision? Would an act-utilitarian think he made the correct moral choice? Why or why not?
2. How would a rule-utilitarian evaluate his decision? Would a rule-utilitarian think he made the correct moral choice? Why or why not?
3. Would a deontologist (a person adhering to Kant's ethics) think his action morally permissible or morally impermissible? Why?
4. Which of these three different evaluations do you agree with most? Why?

 

Conchis's Decision in The Magus:

 

 https://hagopsarkissian.notion.site/888a3f5b04864187a069b9b73efd4a28

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

1 An actutilitarian would evaluate the decision to lie to ones friend about the quality of the painting by considering the overall consequences of the act In this case the consequences of lying to the ... View the full answer