How would you reply to this post?

This is not the post I need to reply to this is just the overview.

Group members can have any of the following attitudes toward the group's main goal: commitment, compliance, resistance, and disengagement. Describe each of these attitudes as you have seen or experienced them while working in a team, and provide examples. Discuss the type of design you want for future teams you are a member of.

INCLUDE NAMES AND LINKS OF WEBSITES USED

INCLUDES IN-TEXT CITATIONS

ALSO INCLUDE IN TEXT CITATION THROUGH OUT THE WRITE UP for all refences and websites used

Readings and ResourcesReadings and Resources

eBook:

Cook, S. (2009). Building a High Performance Team: Proven Techniques for Effective Team Working. Cambridgeshire, UK: IT Governance.

• Chapter 2:The Stages of Team Development, pp. 27-36
• Chapter 3:Roles People Play in a Team, pp. 37-48

Articles, Websites, and Videos:

Thoughts on why some teams are consistent high performers.

• Pentland, A. (2012). The New Science of Building Great Teams. Harvard Business Review, 90(4), 60-70.
• https://services.hbsp.harvard.edu/api/courses/1312719/items/R1204C-PDF-ENG/sclinks/8a7f5f19a0aa729dfbc8c00008b78800

A leading organizational psychologist explains the five critical conditions that make the difference between success and failure.

• Coutu, D., & Beschloss, M. (2009). Why Teams DON'T Work. Harvard Business Review, 87(5), 98-105.
• https://services.hbsp.harvard.edu/api/courses/1312719/items/R0905H-PDF-ENG/sclinks/8a8a1dd231711b45cd11d3be6d2c533a

This video shows clips from Marvel's Avengers film, looking at team development based on Bruce Tuckman'sModel of stages of team and group development as well as team roles in the BelbinTheory.

AVENGERS-TUCKMAN TEAM DEVELOPMENT & BELBIN TEAM ROLESDuration:3:08 User:North Birmingham VTS -Added:9/19/12

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYlzSymbjwA&t=14s

In this video, Donna Howesshares her experiences creating cross-functional teams in a supply-chain organization.

Watch VideoBest Practice in Creating Cross-Functional Teams

Duration:10:41 User:BCODN -Added:5/8/12

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iq3v3fxjHXI

This video explains how geese show teamwork.

Watch VideoCould you build a winning team like this?

Duration:2:29 User:secretover1 -Added:2/27/11

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tz1IgB6IeA

BELOW IS THE POST I NEED TO REPLY TO!!!!

In team enviornments, I have observed hoe the four attitudes, commitment, compliance, resistance, and disengagement can strongly influence group success. Commitment is the most productive attitude, as it reflects motivation and alignment with the teams goals. For ecample, ina work project, my teammates and I were all committed to meeting a tight deadline, which encouraged collaboration and accountability. Compliance is different in that group members will fulfill responsibilities but without the same level of enthusiasm or creativity. I have experienced this when some teammates only did the minimum required, which kept the project moving but limited innovation. Resistance can create conflict, as it often involves pushing back against goals or methods.i saw this ina group assignment where one member resisted the team's chosen approach, which slowed progress until compromise was reached. Disengagement, the least effective attitude, occurs when members withdraw completely. I've experienced this when a teammate stopped participating altogether, which increased the workload for others.

For future teams, I would prefer a design that encourages commitment by promoting open communication, shared leadership, and clearly defined roles. This type of structure not only reduces the chances of diengagement or resistance but also helps members feel valued, which increases buy-in and overall performance. this aligns with Tuckmans's stages of group development (forming, storming, norming and performing), which highlight how effective teams progress by building trust, resolving conflict, and achieving shared goals.

Reference:

Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental Sequence in Small Groups, Psycological Bullentin, 63(6), 384-399.