Question: Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse: Ethics Case Study What is the motivation for Daniel Dunn to not make the design of the bridge more robust based
Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse: Ethics Case Study
What is the motivation for Daniel Dunn to not make the design of the bridge more robust based on the findings of the fabricators?
Was it the responsibility to protect the public interest by Daniel Dunn and Jack Gillum even though it was not expressly written in the contract?
Do you agree that it was the contractual responsibility, in this case, to perform all structural engineering and analysis on the design?
What measures might a Professional Engineer (PE) take if they see risks to health and safety? Or is following the contract to the letter enough measures to take regarding health and safety? Did the fabricators attempt to intervene by showing Dunn and Gillum the flaw? Why didn't they change the plans?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
