I did not know where to post this under but this is a business law question. It is long but you can keep it short sentences!

O 2 4 7 . 6 University of Hard Knocks v Prince Purple The review board of the University System for the State of Hard Knocks is investigating a ruling by the University of Hard Knocks regarding a student's social media activity. You are on the review board for the University System Prince Purple has been cited for violating the Respectful Campus Policy and Social Media Policy Facts Prince Purple was a 22-year-old law school student at the University Hard Knocks School of Law. After President T Shalla's reelection, he posted a Facebook status expressing frustration with Democrats celebrating" abortion. He wrote: All right. I've had it. To all of you who support the Democratic candidates: The Republican Party sucks. But guess what. Your party and your candidates parade their depraved belief in legal child murder around with pride. Disgusting, immoral, and horrific. Don't celebrate T'Challax victory tonight, you sick, disgusting people. You're abhorrent. Shame on you for supporting the genocide against the unborn. If you think gay marriage or the economy or faxes or whatever else is more important than this, you're ---ing ridiculous. You're WORSE than the Germans during WW2. Many of them acted from honest patriotism. Many of them turned a blind eye to the genocide against the Jews. But you're celebrating it. Supporting it. Proudly proclaiming it. You are a disgrace to the name of human. So, sincerely,f--- you, Moloch worshiping a--holes. Several students and a faculty member reported the post to the Dean of Students, who had Prince appear before the Committee on Student Performance and Enhancement (CSPE). The essence of the complaints was that Prince had violated the school's focus on professionalism and civility. Before the hearing, he was discouraged from arguing "free speech" before the panel. After his hearing, the panel found his Facebook post was "unprofessional" and violated the University's Respectful Campus Policy and the Law School's Social Media Policy. CSPE required Prince to write two reflective papers on professionalism, to write an apology letter, to re-write the Facebook post to express the same views in a professional manner, and to meet with a professionalism advisor monthly for a year. CSPE also placed a "notation of professionalism violation" on Prince's record, which would be sent with all law school transcripts/references. ************ Remember this is a hypothetical matter and has not gone to court!!! Please do not tell me about a case unless you are using it in your analysis or case law. This case has not been litigated. ************** Specific Instructions: You are on Prince Purple's Team. (This is the beginning of your project after your title information. Submit each question making sure you re-state the question and then the answer. Do not just provide an answer without stating the question.) First answer the following questions: 1. List any possible violations of Prince Purple's rights by the University. 2. Provide the specific laws the University is accused of violating. Properly cite the statutory law. Secondly, prepare Prince Purple's case/response as to the violations of his rights, using the law and relevant facts. You will provide a case for Prince Purple on any violations you state above. You should provide your case (response/defense) in IRAC Form- (See Legal Writing Modules) State your ISSUE clearly. (Always in the form of a question) RULE - Relevant Law Analysis - This is where you present your response/defense in writing. It should have relevant case statutory law to support your position. Conclusion Clearly state how the Court should find based upon your Analysis. . O 2 4 7 . 6 University of Hard Knocks v Prince Purple The review board of the University System for the State of Hard Knocks is investigating a ruling by the University of Hard Knocks regarding a student's social media activity. You are on the review board for the University System Prince Purple has been cited for violating the Respectful Campus Policy and Social Media Policy Facts Prince Purple was a 22-year-old law school student at the University Hard Knocks School of Law. After President T Shalla's reelection, he posted a Facebook status expressing frustration with Democrats celebrating" abortion. He wrote: All right. I've had it. To all of you who support the Democratic candidates: The Republican Party sucks. But guess what. Your party and your candidates parade their depraved belief in legal child murder around with pride. Disgusting, immoral, and horrific. Don't celebrate T'Challax victory tonight, you sick, disgusting people. You're abhorrent. Shame on you for supporting the genocide against the unborn. If you think gay marriage or the economy or faxes or whatever else is more important than this, you're ---ing ridiculous. You're WORSE than the Germans during WW2. Many of them acted from honest patriotism. Many of them turned a blind eye to the genocide against the Jews. But you're celebrating it. Supporting it. Proudly proclaiming it. You are a disgrace to the name of human. So, sincerely,f--- you, Moloch worshiping a--holes. Several students and a faculty member reported the post to the Dean of Students, who had Prince appear before the Committee on Student Performance and Enhancement (CSPE). The essence of the complaints was that Prince had violated the school's focus on professionalism and civility. Before the hearing, he was discouraged from arguing "free speech" before the panel. After his hearing, the panel found his Facebook post was "unprofessional" and violated the University's Respectful Campus Policy and the Law School's Social Media Policy. CSPE required Prince to write two reflective papers on professionalism, to write an apology letter, to re-write the Facebook post to express the same views in a professional manner, and to meet with a professionalism advisor monthly for a year. CSPE also placed a "notation of professionalism violation" on Prince's record, which would be sent with all law school transcripts/references. ************ Remember this is a hypothetical matter and has not gone to court!!! Please do not tell me about a case unless you are using it in your analysis or case law. This case has not been litigated. ************** Specific Instructions: You are on Prince Purple's Team. (This is the beginning of your project after your title information. Submit each question making sure you re-state the question and then the answer. Do not just provide an answer without stating the question.) First answer the following questions: 1. List any possible violations of Prince Purple's rights by the University. 2. Provide the specific laws the University is accused of violating. Properly cite the statutory law. Secondly, prepare Prince Purple's case/response as to the violations of his rights, using the law and relevant facts. You will provide a case for Prince Purple on any violations you state above. You should provide your case (response/defense) in IRAC Form- (See Legal Writing Modules) State your ISSUE clearly. (Always in the form of a question) RULE - Relevant Law Analysis - This is where you present your response/defense in writing. It should have relevant case statutory law to support your position. Conclusion Clearly state how the Court should find based upon your Analysis