I explored the SCAMPER technique $($Substitute$,$ Combine, Adapt, Magnify, Put to other uses, Eliminate, Rearrange$)$ as a structured framework for generating creative ideas. I applied it to a customer complaint workflow and discovered new possibilities, such as substituting phone calls with chatbots to reduce wait times and combining complaint resolution with sales follow$-$ups to enhance customer satisfaction.

While SCAMPER helped me uncover fresh perspectives, I faced challenges in ensuring the prompts stayed relevant and balancing creativity with practicality. For example, "eliminate" sometimes felt counterproductive, and "magnify" generated ambitious but resource$-$intensive ideas.

I found SCAMPER to be versatile, with applications for personal problem$-$solving $($e$.$g$.,$ improving daily schedules$)$ and organizational innovation $($e$.$g$.,$ product development, process optimization$).$ Ultimately, SCAMPER proved valuable for fostering structured creativity and generating actionable solutions.

Help me find weakenesses and what was done well in the above