Question: I have questions about this U . S . Supreme Court decision in LARRY THOMPSON, PETITIONER v . PAGIEL CLARK, ET AL . ON WRIT
I have questions about this US Supreme Court decision in LARRY THOMPSON, PETITIONER v PAGIEL CLARK, ET AL ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.On page of the dissenting opinion, the Court discusses "malice." Why?
Group of answer choices
"Malice" is in the name of "Malicious Prosecution" so it's is a necessary element.
Because they are angry that the other justices don't agree with them.
Since "actual malice" is required in defamation cases concerning public figures, it should be here, too.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
