i just need help with 5, thanks!

Question #4: Is this misguided, do-gooderism on the part of some naive individuals, or does servant leadership actually have a place in our economic system? Chapter 15-Several of the studies cited in this chapter and a whole lot of studies that have not been red in this chaptershed important light on the issue Eagly and Johnson (1990) Gender and Leadership: A Meta-Analysis report observing that women tend to be more democratic, while men tend to be more autocratic, and marginal differences in terms of being more task or relationship oriented, Gilvan increased environmental uncertainty, pervasive globalization, competitiveness to the point of near hyper competitiveness, technological turbulence at an increasing rate and other factors you are probably well acquainted with has prompted a response of increased use of teams chapter 14-remember fatter organizational archies, more organic structures, and a wealth of other responses. Question as Do these environmental and organizational conditions suggest the superiority of a more feminine style of leadership, over the masculine and directive/autocratic style that appears to be better suited to control-oriented, mechanisti, centralired top-down bureaucratic organisations of the 18th 19th and 20th century Amy B. Gershenol and Roseanne. Foti 2003) Leader Emergence and Gender Roles in Al-Female Groups: A Contextual Examination not cited in this chapter note that: "Although sex and gender role are correlated, gender role is not necessary dictated by biological sex."Rather, gender is a distinct and culturally constructed phenomenon defined as the shared expectations of individuals based solely on socially identified sex. "Masculinity and femininity are often thought of as opposite ends of a continuum, but they are actually independent dimensions."As such, an individual of other sex can be. Masculine, Fortinin, or both Androgynous "Androgyny is associated with exibility in behavior, such that androgynous individuals are able to adapt the behavior to be more or feminine depending on what is appropriate It is frequently assumed that groups have both a maintenance socio-emotional and task need. Androgynous leaders may be more effective than those who are masculine or feminine in nature. The assumption is that the individual's feminine side empathetic, expressive may enable the leader to assist the group as it deals with its maintenance needs, while the leaders' masculine side instrumental, assertive assists in addressing the group's task needs Eagly, Kars, and Mathigan (1995) Gender and Electiveness of Leaders: A Meta-Analysis not in aggregate male and female leaders are active. Howeve male and female leaders are not guy efective in every stron. Men de worse than women in stations that are defined as less than masculine or more feminine in nature. Thus, they note that gender was entirely important in organizations and groups, it would be relevant to leaders' fectiveness and men and women would fare equally well as leaders throughout all types of organizations and groups." "in view of these findings, men may well fnd themselves less effective as leaders in context defined in relatively feminine terms, and similarly, women may well be less effective in their leadership attempts in situations that are defined relatively in masculine forms Question What your opinion of the apparent call towards an androgynous style of leadership as a way forward? Oh, and next week, you will have to post something in order to read what your classmates have posted