I only need help with number 1, thanks.

completed Cases 1. David Olsen, owner of OMMC, Co., entered a contract agreeing to re-paper all of he walls in the city hall of Pittsburgh, PA. When the job was completed, the wallpaper began to come unglued and fu From the walls. The city argued that Olsen was responsible for the problem, while Olsen insisted that the heating system in city hall emitted fumes that comise wallpaper paste to disintegrate. 1. Are Responsive ADR Strategies or Proactive ADR strategies available to Olsen and the city? 2. Explain why you came to that conclusion 2. John and Mary Hickerton were involved in a dispute about the quality of work performed by the Bogus Carpet Company that installed the carpeting in their condominium. It was suggested that the arties hire a mediator to help settle the dispute. The parties followed that suggestion, but the decision of the mediate proved to be unsatisfactory to the Bickertons. Therefore, the Bickets instituted derinin of the mediator w final and sould not be appealed. Is Bogus correct? Explain and discuss 1. David Olsen, owner of OMMC,Coentered content greeing to re-poper all of he walls in the city hall of Pittsburgh, PA. When the job was completed the wallpaper began to come unglued und fall from the walls. The city urged that Olsen was responsible for the problem, while Olsen insisted that the heating system in city hall emitted fumes that cause wallpaper paste to disintegrate 1. Are Responsive ADR Strategies or Proactive ADR strategies available to live and the city 2. Explain why you came to the conclusion 2. John and Mary Bicken wire involved is a dispute about the quality of work performed by the Bogus Carpet Company that installed the carpeting in their condominium. It was muted that the ports bra med help set the dispute. The pures followed that, but the demon of the maior proved to be satisfy to the Bicket. Therefore, the limonintituled