(I will surely downvote if you give generic answer or if you miss even one of the sections mentioned below. If you don't know the answer, please skip it and let others answer it and only hand written answers). The Detective and the Council Member Jack, the councilman, resided for a long time in the area he serves. He graduated from high school in a posh neighbourhood in the city and went to public schools. After college, Jack returned home with his parents and eventually began his own practise of family law. The investigator grew up in the neighbourhood, went to school with Jack, made friends with him and worked as a Summer Camp Counselor and Young Mentor with the City's Parks and Recreation Department. The investigator joined the police department of the city and is well liked by his peers while serving in the community. Jack, who was then in his forties, became involved in local politics and was then elected to the municipality. It is also worth noting that Jack exposed his homosexuality shortly after being elected to the assembly. The suicide of a young man who lived in the same rich neighbourhood as Jack in the late 30s triggered ethics problems. The families became friends and as Jack got older, he always had an eye on the younger son. The deceased, who at the time was with his parents, committed suicide in his home. An investigator was sent to the crime scene to watch the assassination of the individual. The prosecutor met the diary of the dead, which contained several entries outlining a sexual relationship between the departed and the councilman. The events mentioned in the article began when the deceased was 16 years old and Jack was an adult. It was apparent from the submissions that the agreement was mutually advantageous and terminated at the behest of Jack. Since the family asked him about the gay association he had with the councilman, the newspaper revealed that the person who had been dead had a long opiate habit and had depression. The detective did not disclose any information at this time. Jack, a councilman, addressed the prosecutor and demanded a "off record" briefing with him. The prosecutor agreed, and for the first time the two of them talked. The councilman informed the prosecutor straight away that he was confident that the agent was aware of his past interest with the deceased. The member of the council confirmed that the former relationship remained secret. The prosecutor told the councilman that a study and photos were present on the grounds. According to the Councilman, the coroner should leave all those who are calm (go away) and focus his investigation on the facts concerning the cause of death. The researcher rendered no promise to the councilman and told him that he did not know how he went, but did not approach him again. The prosecutor realised that the prior relationships of the council member with the deceased might have major legal and social implications for the deceased. The sergeant of the detective called him to the police station the next day. The sergeant is also well-known to the President of the Board. The Sergeant told the detective that the councilman had already spoken to him. The Sergeant tried to convince the detective that putting the council member in crime would only create shame for the family of the deceased, ridicule for the council member, and confusion in the city. The sergeant recommended that the best action option will be to remain calm and remove information from the case file which were irrelated to the actual cause of death of the deceased. Will the prosecutor hold his mouth shut or would he spill information of a friendship that is more than 15 years old? How is it going to influence? What will the consequences be? IDEAS that are certified In the last few years, a concrete company has become well established. In contrast to its competitors, this concrete maker will make a significant quantity of good quality concrete from a new plastic. As a result, the firm has a good adoption rate and crazy operational levels. The founders of this business are really happy because the company has started to get a lot of cover, which led to more investors buying stock in the sector. On the other side, the concrete company is on the St. John's River, a major waterway. This river is an important resource for Minshewville and an important supply of water for many fish and drinking water in Garden County. The number of pollution in the river has increased in recent years. Algal blooms are very common and not only affect natural biodiversity on the river, but can render the task of cleaning up the water more expensive. Individuals living around the river have started to mourn the stench and how pollutants spoil the charm of the river. They have spent extra money and are always furious, pressuring the Governor of Minshewville to change. During a private survey, the governor and the local environmental agency traced the waste back to the concrete factory. The formulation of a nuclear byproduct has been found to be discharged into the river. When approached by the CEO, he clarified that although he was aware, the future of the product depended on the economy, with the immediate effects bankrupting or shutting and putting about a thousand workers out of work. The governor is divided between what he desires and what he does not want. His re-election is quickly approaching and how he handles the scenario determines whether he is prepared to continue doing his work or not. Many of Minshewville's wealthiest residents are members of the Riverfront Homeowners Association. In the past, not only did these citizens support for him, but also donated to his cause. If the governor wishes to close the operations of the concrete firm, he will retain his votes and perhaps get further support. The private investigation was called to the notice of the environmental agency concerned. You offered to sell the information to a local news source if the governor doesn't do something. The CEO has stated clearly that, if this information is revealed to the market, there would certainly be a chance for many holders and consumers to invest. They would lose their salaries and the employment of the workforce would also be lost. In exchange for Governor's patronage, the CEO committed to donate $1 million to the Governor's re-election campaign, a negotiated price for the use of concrete in local programmes and the support of all business people. If the Governor continues to operate the concrete business, he will be expected to donate a minimum of $1.5 million to the water treatment plants to help to provide safe drinking water. The region is still underfunded by a proposed project to construct more highways. So what is the right plan of action for the governor?