Identifying the Facts and Issues From the information given, it select answer Barnes's acceptance of the offer was made in select answer select answer that there were open terms in the offer. manner, indicating that it a valid acceptance. One potential problem with the acceptance is that it require that the select answer .The law that governs this contract select answer acceptance be the mirror image of the offer. The term added by Barnes in accepting the offer would be select answer contract. Because the parties are select answer select answer given, the offer select answer T term to the merchants, the additional terms become part of the contract unless certain conditions exist. In the facts as limit acceptance to its terms. - Stripes select answer object to the new or changed term within a reasonable time. Under normal circumstances, the change from one national trucking company to another national trucking company select answer be a material change to the contract. Given these facts, the parties likely agreed upon select answer select answer Stripes likely select answer as the trucking company for the contract. Stripes used and because the parties specifically agreed on select answer breach the contract. k Assume that On-Demand Truck Line has a location in Stripes's town and would pick up the shirts at Stripes's factory. Assume also that Stripes regularly uses On-Demand Truck Line and gets a significant discount. The use of Blue Express Truck Line will require Stripes to deliver the shirts to a town 150 miles away (because Blue Express won't pick up that far from its location) and will cost Stripes an additional $600 in shipping costs. Stripes did not contact Barnes about the change but considered it a proposal which he could ignore. He shipped using On-Demand Truck Lines. The offer, as now stated, select answer include a limitation to the terms of the offer. Stripes select answer objected select answer contacted Barnes about the change in trucking companies. If Stripes had .then the change in trucking companies select answer part of the contract. Because Stripes did not object, the only argument that he has to use On-Demand Truck Lines is that the change in the contract is select answer change. Several factors may influence the court in making this decision, including unreasonable select answer for Stripes. If the change in price and delivery location for Stripes is determined to be select answer ,then would be the trucking select answer select answer company for the contract. If this is the case, then would be the likely breaching party. Case Problem Analysis: Additional Terms Stripes, a clothing manufacturer from Maine, offered to sell Barnes, the owner of a clothing store in California, one thousand shirts for a stated price to be paid on delivery of the shirts. The offer declared that shipment would be made by On-Demand Truck Line to Barnes's store. Barnes replied, "I accept your offer for one thousand shirts at the price quoted. However, delivery is to be made by Blue Express Truck Line." Both On-Demand Truck Line and Blue Express Truck Line are well-known national companies. Three weeks later. Stripes shipped the shirts by On-Demand Truck Line, which was just a few dollars cheaper, and Barnes refused to accept delivery. Stripes sued for breach of contract. Barnes claimed that there never was a contract because his reply, which included a modification of carriers, did not constitute an acceptance. Barnes further claimed that, even if there had been a contract. Stripes would have been in breach because Stripes shipped the shirts by On-Demand, contrary to the contract terms. Identifying the Facts and Issues From the information given, it select answer Barnes's acceptance of the offer was made in select answer select answer that there were open terms in the offer. manner, indicating that it a valid acceptance. One potential problem with the acceptance is that it require that the select answer .The law that governs this contract select answer acceptance be the mirror image of the offer. The term added by Barnes in accepting the offer would be select answer contract. Because the parties are select answer select answer given, the offer select answer T term to the merchants, the additional terms become part of the contract unless certain conditions exist. In the facts as limit acceptance to its terms. - Stripes select answer object to the new or changed term within a reasonable time. Under normal circumstances, the change from one national trucking company to another national trucking company select answer be a material change to the contract. Given these facts, the parties likely agreed upon select answer select answer Stripes likely select answer as the trucking company for the contract. Stripes used and because the parties specifically agreed on select answer breach the contract. k Assume that On-Demand Truck Line has a location in Stripes's town and would pick up the shirts at Stripes's factory. Assume also that Stripes regularly uses On-Demand Truck Line and gets a significant discount. The use of Blue Express Truck Line will require Stripes to deliver the shirts to a town 150 miles away (because Blue Express won't pick up that far from its location) and will cost Stripes an additional $600 in shipping costs. Stripes did not contact Barnes about the change but considered it a proposal which he could ignore. He shipped using On-Demand Truck Lines. The offer, as now stated, select answer include a limitation to the terms of the offer. Stripes select answer objected select answer contacted Barnes about the change in trucking companies. If Stripes had .then the change in trucking companies select answer part of the contract. Because Stripes did not object, the only argument that he has to use On-Demand Truck Lines is that the change in the contract is select answer change. Several factors may influence the court in making this decision, including unreasonable select answer for Stripes. If the change in price and delivery location for Stripes is determined to be select answer ,then would be the trucking select answer select answer company for the contract. If this is the case, then would be the likely breaching party. Case Problem Analysis: Additional Terms Stripes, a clothing manufacturer from Maine, offered to sell Barnes, the owner of a clothing store in California, one thousand shirts for a stated price to be paid on delivery of the shirts. The offer declared that shipment would be made by On-Demand Truck Line to Barnes's store. Barnes replied, "I accept your offer for one thousand shirts at the price quoted. However, delivery is to be made by Blue Express Truck Line." Both On-Demand Truck Line and Blue Express Truck Line are well-known national companies. Three weeks later. Stripes shipped the shirts by On-Demand Truck Line, which was just a few dollars cheaper, and Barnes refused to accept delivery. Stripes sued for breach of contract. Barnes claimed that there never was a contract because his reply, which included a modification of carriers, did not constitute an acceptance. Barnes further claimed that, even if there had been a contract. Stripes would have been in breach because Stripes shipped the shirts by On-Demand, contrary to the contract terms