Question: Identifying the Facts and Issues The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act attempts to prevent abuses by collection agencies . Specialized debt - collection agencies and

Identifying the Facts and Issues
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act attempts to prevent abuses by
collection agencies
. Specialized
debt-collection agencies
and
attorneys
who regularly attempt to collect debts on behalf of someone else are considered debt collectors under the FDCPA. Creditors
are not
covered by the act unless they cause debtors to believe they are collection agencies. Rader
was
an attorney who regularly attempts to collect debts on behalf of someone else. Recover Debt
was
set up as a debt-collection agency.
Assessment question
Recover Debt
was
covered by the FDCPA, and it could not legally contact the debtor at the debtor's place of employment if the
debtor's employer
objects, contact the debtor at
inconvenient
or unusual times, or contact the debtors
family
about the payment of a debt without court authorization. Recover Debt
did
do any of these activities.
Assessment question
If Recover Debt was covered by the FDCPA, it could not legally
harass
or intimidate the debtor using
abusive
language or
threats
. Recover Debt
did
do this activity. Because of its behavior, Recover Debt likely
did
violate the FDCPA.
Assessment question
What If the Facts Were Different?
Assume that Rader started his business and bought the checks, then he set up a strict protocol for collecting the checks. Employees were trained to put together a file on each debtor with the information from the checks, information they could find on the Internet and any other information that they could find through public records searches. The employees first would send a letter to the most current address of the debtor, requesting a forwarding address if needed. After two weeks, if no payment had been made based on the letter, the employees would begin to call phone numbers for the debtors, including spouses and parents. These calls were made at dinnertime in order to catch people at home. They also would contact the debtors most recent place of employment and any financial advisers. These calls were made during the workday and were to cease if the employer objected. Employees were trained to be firm but professional in the collection of the debt and to inform the debtor, or family members, that the company would pursue all legal remedies to collect on the debt. Employees were also instructed not to communicate with debtors after receiving notice that the debtor refused to pay.
Under these facts, Recover Debt
select answer
covered by the FDCPA. Recover Debt
select answer
contact the debtor at the debtor's place of employment if the debtors employer objected and
select answer
contact the debtor at inconvenient or unusual times. Recover Debt
select answer
contact individuals other than the debtors, including spouses and parents, and the debtors employers or financial advisers. Recover Debt
select answer
harass or intimidate the debtor using abusive language or threats and
select answer
communicate with debtors after receiving notice that the debtor refused to pay.
Assessment question
Because of its behavior, Recover Debt likely
select answer
violate the FDCPA.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!