If Carlos asked me how sharing eDiscovery is different from sharing regular evidence, I would say the biggest shift is that the evidence lives in digital ecosystems. We are not just swapping scanned PDFs anymore. We are handling emails, chats, cloud documents, mobile data, databases, and all the hidden context around them, like metadata that shows who created a file, when it was changed, and how it moved across systems. That extra digital context means there is more that can go wrong if we do not preserve and handle it carefully, and there is more we need to plan up front so our process is reasonable and defensible. From my Week 1 learning materials, I am starting to see eDiscovery as a structured lifecycle that includes preserve, collect, process, review, and produce. Planning and communication matter just as much as the legal rules. Bennett's discussion of reasonable search, proportionality, and cooperation helped me connect the dots. A reasonable search is not about scooping up everything. It is about using targeted and explainable methods, like custodians, date ranges, file types, and tested keywords, that actually fit the issues in the case. Proportionality means right sizing the effort to the importance of the issues and the burden and cost, so we do not blow a small dispute into a giant data hunt. Cooperation is practical. If both sides talk early about sources, formats, timelines, and limitations, they can avoid wasteful fights and move discovery faster and cheaper