If projects are mutually exclusive, only one project can be chosen. The internal rate of return (IRR) and the net present value (NPV) methods will not always choose the same project. If the crossover rate on the NPV profile is below the horizontal axis, the methods will always, sometimes, or never, agree.

Projects W and X are mutually exclusive projects. Their cash flows and NPV profiles are shown as follows.

Year	Project W	Project X
0	$1,000	$1,500
1	$200	$350
2	$350	$500
3	$400	$600
4	$600	$750

If the required rate of return for each project is 14%, do the NPV and IRR methods agree or conflict?

The methods agree.

The methods conflict.

A key to resolving this conflict is the assumed reinvestment rate. The IRR calculation assumes that intermediate cash flows are reinvested at the IRR, Required rate of return, MIRR , and the NPV calculation implicitly assumes that the rate at which cash flows can be reinvested is the IRR, Required rate of return, MIRR.

As a result, when evaluating mutually exclusive projects, the IRR or NPV method is usually the better decision criterion.

I will thumbs up all answers.

Multiple choice choices are in BOLD

Project X NPV (Dollars) Project w -200 0 2 4 16 18 20 6 8 10 12 14 COST OF CAPITAL (Percent)