Ignacio is an incredibly intelligent $9-$ycar$-$old child. He is top of his class and is poised to receive the coveted Little Einstein Award. Ignacio is out shopping with his parents when he notices a worker on top of a ladder with wheels on it$.$ Being a playful child, Ignacio walks past several warning signs and pushes the ladder so that it starts rolling. As a result, the worker falls and injures both legs and his hip. Which of the following is a likely outcome should the worker decide to sue the child?

$$ choren under the age of to lack capacity, so the worker wound de unsuccessful in winhing a tort

claim.

$$ Because Ignacio is under age $18,$ his parents would be held responsible under respondeat superior They should have known not to bring their child near a potentially dangerous work environment.

O Ignacio could be held liable under the Negligence Per Se Doctrine, which states that ignacio

automatically committed negligence when he put the worker in danger.

O Ignacio would not be held liable because he did not intend to injure the worker.

$$ Because of Ignacio's knowledge and experience, as reflected in $-$ among other things $-$ his academic success, Ignacio would be held liable under the subjective standard for a breach of duty to keep the worker's working conditions free from danger.