Question: IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No . : 2 0 - 2 1 5 4 8 - CA HOMER SIMPSON and MARGE SIMPSON,

IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
Case No.: 20-21548-CA
HOMER SIMPSON and
MARGE SIMPSON,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
HAPPY SUMO, INC.,
a Florida Corporation,
Defendant.
_________________________/
PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
Plaintiffs, HOMER SIMPSON and MARGE SIMPSON, by and through their undersigned attorney, moves this Court to enter its Order compelling production of the original or a legible copy of the documents hereinafter set forth. In support of this Motion, Platinffs would show:
1. On November 31,2020, Plaintiffss served defendant, HAPPY SUMO, INC., with
Plaintiffs First Request For The Production of Documents To Defendant Happy Sumo, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as Plaintiffs Request for Production) a copy of which is attached to this Motion as Exhibit A.
2. Furthermore, within Plaintiff's Request for Production, the second request states:
All documents related to employment, including but not limited to application(s) for employment, pay stubs, W-4 forms, and performance records for all employees in the eighteen (18) month period preceding the incident.
3. On December 15,2020, defendant, HAPPY SUMO, INC., replied to Plaintiffs Request
for Production and provided employment records for November 1,2021, only.
4. Under Fla. R. Civ. 1.280(b)(2):
Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter of the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or the claim or defense of any other party, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any books, documents, or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter. It is not ground for objection that the information sought will be inadmissible at the trial if the information sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
5. The request outlined in Plaintiffs Request for Production is within its scope of discovery.
6. The defendant's initial response was deficient, and between December 22,2021, and
January 15,2021, the parties exchanged correspondence relating to the production required under the Plaintiff's Request for Production, however, the parties did not resolve their differences. A copy of the correspondence between the parties is attached to this Motion as Exhibit B.
7. The deadline set forth in the correspondence has now lapsed and to date, the foregoing
documents have not been provided to Plaintiffs counsel.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffss moves this Court to enter its Order compelling production of the original or legible copies of the above-referenced documents, and for attorneys fees and costs.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing has been filed with the Florida Court E-Filing Portal and a true and correct copy has been furnished by Electronic Mail to: JIM BRONSON, ESQ., jbronson@bronsonlaw.com; itoli@bronsonlaw.com; on this the ___ day of March 2021.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!