Question: In Australian law, what issues does direct interference poses in proving trespass to person? What is the extent to which Australian law is consistent with,
In Australian law, what issues does direct interference poses in proving trespass to person? What is the extent to which Australian law is consistent with, or diverges from, the position taken in England or other international jurisdictions on the topic of directness?
Cases to consider:
- Scott v Shepherd (1773) 96 ER 525
- Platt v Nutt [1988] Aust Torts Reports 80-164
Refer to: https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/journal_contribution/Abolition_or_Reform_The_Future_for_Directness_as_a_Requirement_of_Trespass_in_Australia/10064021?backTo=/collections/Volume_34_Issue_1/4723145
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
