Question: In Australian law, what issues does direct interference poses in proving trespass to person? What is the extent to which Australian law is consistent with,

In Australian law, what issues does direct interference poses in proving trespass to person? What is the extent to which Australian law is consistent with, or diverges from, the position taken in England or other international jurisdictions on the topic of directness?

Cases to consider:

- Scott v Shepherd (1773) 96 ER 525

- Platt v Nutt [1988] Aust Torts Reports 80-164

Refer to: https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/journal_contribution/Abolition_or_Reform_The_Future_for_Directness_as_a_Requirement_of_Trespass_in_Australia/10064021?backTo=/collections/Volume_34_Issue_1/4723145

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Law Questions!