In doing epistemology and metaphysics, philosophers are either explicitly or implicitly asking: What are we that...

Transcribed Image Text:

In doing epistemology and metaphysics, philosophers are either explicitly or implicitly asking: What are we that we may know the world, and what is the world that we may know it? Put differently, the nature of reality has implications for our ability to know reality "in itself", and our ability to know has implications for how we interpret reality. In your own words, compare and contrast both Plato's and Aristotle's answer to these questions. In short, how do they differ both in their interpretation of the nature of reality and our ability to know it? In doing epistemology and metaphysics, philosophers are either explicitly or implicitly asking: What are we that we may know the world, and what is the world that we may know it? Put differently, the nature of reality has implications for our ability to know reality "in itself", and our ability to know has implications for how we interpret reality. In your own words, compare and contrast both Plato's and Aristotle's answer to these questions. In short, how do they differ both in their interpretation of the nature of reality and our ability to know it?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Pl ato believed in the existence of objective reality which he called the real m of Forms This realm ... View the full answer