In Mabo vs Qld (no 2) (1992)175 CLR 1. Justice Brennan stated at (29) that in discharging
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
In Mabo vs Qld (no 2) (1992)175 CLR 1. Justice Brennan stated at (29) that “in discharging its duty to declare the common law of Australia, this court is not free to adopt rules that accord with contemporary notions of justice and human rights if their adoption would fracture the skeleton of principle which gives the body of our law its shape and internal consistency” -
Do you think that the high court did “fracture the skeleton of principle” in reaching the decision that it did in the Mabo case?
Related Book For
Introduction to Business Law
ISBN: 9780324826999
3rd Edition
Authors: Jeff rey F. Beatty, Susan S. Samuelson
Posted Date: