1. In Martin v. State, what was the factual basis for Martin's claim that his conduct wasn't voluntary?
2. In People v. Newton, in which the police officer John Frey was shot by the defendant, what jury instruction did the defendant, Newton, argue should have been given to the jury?
3. In Pope v. State, what did the prosecution say created a duty for the defendant, Joyce Pope, to intervene and stop Melissa Norris from beating her three-month-old infant?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Martin v State In Martin v State the defendant Martin was convicted of murder He argued on appeal that his conduct was not voluntary because he was intoxicated at the time of the crime The factual bas... View the full answer