In Module Two, you learned about the relationship between the decision-making process and discretion in criminal justice, and in Module Three, you learned how to analyze discretionary decisions made by criminal justice professionals. You will now apply this knowledge to analyze a discretionary decision in a scenario. This application of knowledge will help you prepare for the submission of Project Two in Module Seven, in which you will write a memo to be submitted to the Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee regarding the actions and discretionary decisions made by a judge.

• First, review the Project Two Guidelines and Rubric document.
• Next, review the Project Two Scenario PDF document. You will use this document to complete this assignment.
• Then, using the Module Four Assignment template, address the following:
  • Discretionary Decision: What was one discretionary decision made by the judge in the scenario provided?
  • Impacts of Decision: Who is affected by this decision? Does it have positive or negative impacts?
  • Law and Policy: What laws or policies may have influenced the judge to reach the decision? How does discretion impact the decision made in accordance with law and policy?

Specifically, the following rubric criteria must be addressed:

• Describe a discretionary decision made by the judge in the scenario provided.
• Describe impacts of the decision.
• Explain parts of the decision-making process in which discretion can be applied in accordance with law and policy.

What to Submit

This assignment must be completed using the Module Four Assignment Template

Project 2

Competency

In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competency:

• Describe best practices used in discretionary decision making

Scenario

You are the public representative of a rape victim's family. The judge ordered a jail sentence of six months with a lifetime registration as a sex offender for the defendant. The family is not satisfied with the judge's ruling. You have been asked to write a memo to be submitted to the Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee. Using the full scenario and the template (both linked in the Supporting Materials section), compose a memo regarding the actions and discretionary decisions made by the judge.

Directions

You will be creating a written memo to submit to the head of the Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee. Your memo should have all sections identified and should address all of these required elements:

1. Explain parts of the decision-making process in which discretion can be applied in accordance with law and policy. Answer the following questions in your explanation:
   • What laws or policies may influence criminal justice professionals (in this scenario, the judge) to reach decisions in the stages of the criminal justice process (arrest, indictment, conviction)?
   • How does discretion impact the decisions made in accordance with law and policy?
2. Analyze discretionary decisions made by criminal justice professionals. Address the following in your analysis:
   • What decisions were made by the judge?
   • Who is affected by the decisions?
   • Do they have negative or positive impacts?
3. Identify specific steps in the discretionary decision-making process that may lead to negative and legal impacts. Address the following in your identification:
   • What are the specific steps in the discretionary decision-making process that may lead to negative impacts?
   • Could the judge have done anything differently in any specific step to have made a positive impact?
4. Describe the role discovery plays in the decision-making documentation process.
   • What role did discovery play in this process?
   • Which step in the decision-making process does discovery fall under?

What to Submit

To complete this project, you must submit the following:

Memo to the Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee Using the scenario and template linked in the Supporting Materials section, create a written memo regarding the judge and practices used in discretionary decision making. The statement should address the rubric criteria listed above: discretion, law, and policy; analyzing discretionary decisions; impacts of steps in the decision-making process; and discovery.

Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Word document with 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Any sources should be cited according to APA style.

CJ 230 Project Two Scenario A student from an elite educational institution in California has been arrested, charged, and convicted of a sexual assault for engaging in a sexual act with an unconscious victim. The defendant was identified by two individuals who witnessed the defendant engaging in the sexual act. The results of the victim's sexual assault examination at the hospital showed bruising around the neck and genital areas. Prior to sentencing, the defendant's family made a point to the court that the defendant's life should not be ruined by "moments of sexual activity." While the prosecution recommended a sentence of six years in state prison for the crime, the pre-sentencing report from probation recommended a jail sentence of less than a year of confinement. The judge, an alumnus of the same elite institution, ordered a jail sentence of six months with a lifetime registration as a sex offender. The victim's family is not satisfied with the judge's ruling. As the public representative of the victim's family, you are asked to compose a memo to be submitted to the Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee regarding the actions and discretionary decisions made by the judge. California Penal Code Section 261(a)(2-4) states the following: (a) Rape is an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a person not the spouse of the perpetrator, under any of the following circumstances: (2) Where it is accomplished against a person's will by means of force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury on the person or another. (3) Where a person is prevented from resisting by any intoxicating or anesthetic substance, or any controlled substance, and this condition was known, or reasonably should have been known by the accused. (4) Where a person is at the time unconscious of the nature of the act, and this is known to the accused. As used in this paragraph, "unconscious of the nature of the act" means incapable of resisting because the victim meets any one of the following conditions: (A) Was unconscious or asleep. (B) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant that the act occurred. Unless otherwise noted, rape is punishable by imprisonment for 3, 6, or 8 years, as well as a fine not to exceed $70 (to be paid towards AIDS education).