In particular, you were introduced to three decision-making techniques -- majority rule, minority rule by authority or expertise, and consensus rule -- each with their own pros and cons. Using these pros and cons, identify the decision-making technique that you think would be best in the following scenarios and explain why:

A local branch of a political party needs to decide what five key issues it wants to include in the national party's platform.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

In the scenario where a local branch of a political party needs to decide what five key issues to include in the national partys platform the decisionmaking technique of consensus rule would likely be the most suitable Heres why Pros of Consensus Rule 1 Collaboration and Inclusivity Consensus rule promotes collaboration and inclusivity by ensuring that all members have a voice in the decisionmaking process This is important in a political setting where diverse perspectives and opinions need to be considered 2 Commitment and BuyIn When a decision is reached through consensus it often leads to greater commitment and buyin from all members This can help ensure that the selected key issues are supported by the entire local branch increasing the likelihood of successful implementation 3 Conflict Resolution Consensus rule encourages open communication and dialogue among members which can help resolve conflicts and disagreements in a constructive manner This is crucial in a political party setting where differing viewpoints may exist Cons of Consensus Rule 1 TimeConsuming Achieving consensus can be a timeconsuming process as it requires thorough discussion and negotiation to address everyones concerns and reach a mutually agreeable decision ... View the full answer