Question: In situations where the hot pursuit exception does not apply and search incident to arrest exceptions do not apply, a warrantless search for evanescent evidence

In situations where the hot pursuit exception does not apply and search incident to arrest exceptions do not apply, a warrantless search for evanescent evidence is permissible when: Group of answer choices All of the above The exigency was not police-created The procedures employed are reasonable There is probable cause to believe that evidence will be destroyed, lost, or devalued

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer

Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image

Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock

Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Law Questions!

1. Based on the forecasts above, use the spreadsheet below to construct a pro forma income statement for Idexo over the next five years. What is the annual growth rate of the firm's net income over...

Need to write brief case which must include: Title, Citation and Procedural History 2. Facts of the Case 3. Issues 4. Decisions (Holdings) 5. Reasoning (Rationale) 6. Separate Opinions 7. Analysis...

Question 2 (2.5 points) The claim of self-defense was first recognized: Question 2 options: in the Model Penal Code. under common law. in the Bill of Rights. in the U.S. Code. Question 3 (2.5 points)...

Overview HOLDINGS: [1]-Under the good faith exception to the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule , it was not necessary to suppress evidence from an officer's warrantless entry into defendant's garage...

Cite as: 573 U. S. ____ (2014) 1 Opinion of the Court NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are...

Page 1 1 of 106 DOCUMENTS DAVID LEON RILEY, Petitioner (No. 13-132) v. CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES, Petitioner (No. 13-212) v. BRIMA WURIE 13-132, 13-212 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 134 S. Ct....

R. v. Feeney (1997, SCC) is a decision out of the Supreme Court of Canada with Charter implications for how public safety officers conduct their day-to-day duties. You will find specific arguments in...

Based on below case, write brief case which includes following parts: Title citation procedure history facts Legal question Decisions (Holdings) Reasoning (Rationale)( has to be in bullets or number...

STATE OF NEW YORK v. ACHMAN (hypothetical case) Class Assignment: Must use at least THREE Amendments of the U.S. Constitution AND THREE precedent cases discussed in class, prepare an argument in...

Issue: What overarching issue was the court addressing or resolving (one questions not a paragraph just one sentence encapsulating) Facts: What are the facts that the court described and cared about?...

Use Stokes' theorem to evaluate the flux integral (curl F N) dS, where F = (cos z+4y)i+(sin z+4x)j+(xz)k, S is part of the surface z = 9-r -y? with z 2 0, and N points upward.

Ahmed visited different cities of Pakistan for business meeting, he decided to measure the distance of different cities from Karachi to Peshawar. When he came back. He measured the total distance in...

The introductory paragraph will generally be ______________________ 2 sentences. 5-8 sentences. at least 12 sentences. at least 8 sentences

Jackson Company uses lower cost or market in valuing its inventory. They need to find the market value for the following inventory. The selling price is $225, costs to complete $80, normal profit...