In storytelling with data, when considering "what" when establishing the context of an explanatory analysis, what does the author suggest is a false assumption?

You should always want your audience to know or do something

Even if you highlight and recommend something wrong, it prompts the right sort of conversation focused on action

The audience knows better than the presenter and therefore should be left to choose whether and how to act on the information presented

If you are the one analyzing and communicating the data, you likely know it best

If you can't concisely articulate something for the audience to know or do$,$ you should revisit whether you need to communicate