In the case below, the original source material is given along with a sample of student work. Determine the type of plagiarism by clicking the appropriate radio button.

$\backslash$table$[[$Original Source Material,Student Version$],[\backslash$table$[[$To summarize, the elaboration model of$],[$instruction starts by presenting$],[$knowledge at a very general or$],[$simplified level in the form of a special$],[$kind of overview. Then it proceeds to$],[$add detail or complexity in "layers"$],[$across the entire breadth of the$],[$content of the course $($or curriculum$),],[$one layer at a time, until the desired$],[$level of detail or complexity is$],[$reached$.],[$References:$],[$Reigeluth$,$ C$.$ M$.(1999).$ The elaboration$],[$theory: Guidance for scope and$],[$sequence decisions. In C$.$ M$.$ Reigeluth$],[($Ed$.),$ Instructional design theories and$],[$models: A new paradigm of instructional$],[$theory $($Vol$.$ II$,$ pp$.425-453).$ Hillsdale,$],[$NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.$]],\backslash$table$[[$They soon switched to a model based on$],[$the elaboration theory $($Reigeluth$,1999).],[$Using this approach, the game would$],[$begin with a level that offered the$],[$simplest version of the whole task $($the$],[$epitome$)$; subsequent levels would$],[$become increasingly more complex$--$an$],[$approach common to videogames$--$with$],[$opportunities for review and synthesis.$],[$References:$],[$Reigeluth$,$ C$.$ M$.(1999).$ The elaboration$],[$theory: Guidance for scope and$],[$sequence decisions. In C$.$ M$.$ Reigeluth$],[($Ed$.),$ Instructional design theories and$],[$models: A new paradigm of instructional$],[$theory $($Vol$.$ II$,$ pp$.425-453).$ Hillsdale,$],[$NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.$]]]]$