in this case there is no doubt that the defendant is liable for his negligence for selling the contaminated water bottle i also feel that some of the damages stated by the plaintiff like personality change, loss in business, depression, no sense of humour etc are somewhat in appropriate and remote, thus making the lawsuit less reasonable hence it will be difficult to prove in court that all this happened due to the contaminated water bottle there is also the fact to be considered about the negli

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Solution The law of obligations concerns the legal rights and duties owed between people Three primary categories make up the common law of obligation... View the full answer