Incorrect

Question $8$

$\frac{0}{1}$ pts

Select the best answer choice.

Big Ag Services, LLC$,$ entered into a contract with Arkanjamison Fresh Eggs, LLC$,$ that referred to "manure brokering services." Big Ag agreed to pay Arkanjamison Fresh "service fees" for "all available tonnage per year of manure," which would then be resold to other parties. But the parties' contract did not specify the amount of manure. When Arkanjamison Fresh did not carry out the contract, Big $Ag$ sued for breach. A jury ruled that the primary purpose of the contract was for "manure brokering" $($a service$)$ rather than the "purchase of manure" $($goods$)$ and thus the UCC did not apply. The state trial court awarded Big Ag more than $$2\mathrm{.}5$ million in damages. Arkanjamison Fresh appealed.

How should the reviewing court hold on the issue of whether the UCC applies to this transaction?

The reviewing court should affirm the lower court's decision.

The reviewing court should hold that the CISG applies to this transaction.

The reviewing court should hold that common law applies to this transaction.

The reviewing court should hold that the UCC applies to this transaction.