Interwebs began developing sophisticated programs that would take the users location at the time of posting and tag it in the metadata of the post which users can choose to share or not share to their subscribers. Interwebs also created programs that would track which posts users viewed or commented on and would modify the content the user would see based on their predicted preferences. Interwebs would compile all this data and sell it by allowing advertisers to choose which group of users it wanted its ads displayed in front of and charging the advertisers to target specific demographics. When users would first sign up for the site, it required agreement with Interwebs privacy policy which stated that users' data may be "collected and used for a variety of reasons." Unbeknownst to users, the U$.$S$.$ government was also monitoring the user's posts and meta data information to gain access to users' whereabouts and activities. What is the best argument that this a violation of the users' constitutional rights?

The metadata was non$-$public and users did not consent to its disclosure.

Individuals have an explicit constitutional right to privacy.

The individuals cannot waive their rights to privacy to all data collected upon using the app.

The Patriot Act does not give the government and businesses the authority to monitor internet activities.