Is an employer negligent for failing to protect an employee from being attacked by a dog. regardless
Question:
Is an employer negligent for failing to protect an employee from being attacked by a dog. regardless of whether the dog is known to have abnormally dangerous propensities? (See the Labaj VanHouton case.)
O An employer has no duties in regard to an animal on the premises because of the rule that animals cannot be absolutely controlled under any circumstances,
O An employer can be held strictly liable for failing to protect an employee from getting attacked by a dog, even if the dog is not known to possess abnormally dangerous propensities.
O An employer cannot be negligent for failing to protect an employee from getting attacked by a dog unless the dog is not known to possess abnormally dangerous propensities.
O An employer can be negligent for failing to protect an employee from getting attacked by a dog, even if the dog is not known to possess abnormally dangerous propensities.
Introduction to Business Law
ISBN: 9780324826999
3rd Edition
Authors: Jeff rey F. Beatty, Susan S. Samuelson