is due to the fact these two cases first start out on different bases. In the case of Troxel v. nville the mother wanted to limit contact with the grandparents due to the death of the er, she was not seeking to remove visitation completely. Whereas the client's case he as custodial parent is looking to remove contact and visitation rights from the grandmother pletely due to her political views. In Troxel v. Granville, the custodial mother was not cerned with the possible aggressive nature of the grandparents, nor did the child witness gument that scared them making them emotional unlike that of the client's case. This is re they differ significantly. In conclusion, while the opinion has some aspects in which the are similar such as the grandparents seeking visitation overall there are not enough lar facts to state the opinion is "on all fours" with the client's case