Issue: The specific issue in this case is whether Tonya, an African American registered nurse, has a valid claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of $1964$ against the hospital for race discrimination based on the hospital$$s actions in response to the father$$s discriminatory request.

Title VII Theory Asserted by Tonya: Tonya is asserting a theory of disparate treatment under Title VII. Disparate treatment occurs when an employer treats an employee differently based on a protected characteristic $($such as race$)$ and the differential treatment results in adverse employment actions.

Application of the Facts to the Legal Rule:

Protected Characteristic $($Race$)$: Tonya is an African American nurse, which qualifies her as a member of a protected class under Title VII.

Adverse Employment Action: The hospital reassigned Tonya to another patient based on her race, complying with the father$$s discriminatory request. This reassignment constitutes an adverse employment action.

Causation: The hospital$$s actions were directly linked to Tonya$$s race. The note in the baby$$s file explicitly stated $$No African American nurse to take care of this baby.$$ The hospital's compliance with the discriminatory request and subsequent failure to assign any black nurses for a month further demonstrate the causal link between Tonya's race and the adverse employment action.

Notice from Legal Department: Despite notice from the hospital$$s legal department that the ICU should not honor the father$$s request, the hospital did not assign any black nurses to care for the child for the next month. This indicates that the hospital had knowledge of the discriminatory nature of the request and still failed to rectify the situation.

Emotional Distress, Humiliation, Mental Anguish, and Damage to Reputation: Tonya seeks damages for emotional distress, humiliation, mental anguish, and damage to her reputation resulting from the discriminatory treatment. The hospital's actions, including the posting of a discriminatory note and failure to assign black nurses despite legal advice, contribute to the harm suffered by Tonya.

Conclusion: Based on the facts alleged by Tonya, it is evident that she has a strong case under Title VII for race discrimination against the hospital. The hospital's actions clearly violated the law by complying with the discriminatory request and failing to rectify the situation despite knowledge of its discriminatory nature. Tonya should prevail in her Title VII lawsuit against the hospital, and she deserves compensation for the harm she suffered due to the hospital$$s discriminatory conduct.