j(I will surely downvote if you give generic answer or if you miss even one of the sections mentioned below. If you don't know the answer, please skip it and let others answer it)The Medical Ethics Committee is named a medical staff board at the hospital. It responds to the Medical Executive Committee and the Chairman of the medical workers, along with the President and Chairman of the medical personnel. As a multidisciplinary body of medical staff including physicians, nurses, social workers, lawyers, and representatives of the general group (for collective representation) several members of the committee have been qualified in professional ethics and chosen because they wished to address ethical challenges and because of their collaborative qualities of patients and staff. The hospital administrators also hired a consulting firm to "modernise" the structure. The consultants suggested that the "old" style of social workers be transformed into a new position for case managers. The advisers note that there are three social workers on the Ethics Committee. The Ethics Committee's members were told not to take part in this committee and to a case management specialist who has little experience in ethical consultation nor does she know anything about the Ethics Committee tradition in your hospital. In the Chairman of the Ethics Committee three of the creators is "dead." The Chair is lively and all other members of the Committee, particularly the members of the medical personnel of the Committee, are reacting immediately. The boss of the hospital has assigned you to handle this mess. How can you do that? If from the very beginning you were expected to handle the reconfiguration recommended by the commission, what might have been achieved rather than that? How have you applied success monitoring practises to better handle those changes? Provide your comment specifics Complete the blanks with the responses to each situation. You can include at least 500 words in your article post.