Joseph Doud has a five$-$year contract through June $2025$ to coach the men$$s rowing program at his Alma Mater Manhattan College. He earns $$50,000$ per year.

After a series of disagreements with Athletic Director Maria O$$Reilly$,$ Doud quietly negotiates a five$-$year deal with Saint John$$s Athletic Director Michangelo Craggio to coach their men$$s rowing team for the sum of $$200,000$ per year. At no time did Saint John$$s Athletic Director Michangelo Craggio contact Manhattan College Athletic Maria O$$Reilly before reaching the deal with Coach Doud. Coach Doud also takes the core men$$s four from the rowing team with him.

An outraged Manhattan Athletic Director Maria O$$ Reilly comes to you in search of justice and how to remedy this desertion by Joseph Doud.

To replace Coach Doud, they hire Mickey Ward for two years at $$75,000$ per year.

$\mathrm{.}1.$ What court within the Unified Court System of the State of New York has jurisdiction to hear this case? Include in your answer the definition of jurisdiction. $2.$ With respect to Coach Doud; what substantive theory of law could Manhattan College sue him under and what damages if any, should they claim?

$3.$ With respect to Saint John$$s$,$ what substantive theory of law could Manhattan College sue Saint John$$s under and what damages if an$,$ should they claim?

$4.$ In order to avoid similar risk in the future, what would you tell Saint John$$s Athletic Director Michangelo Craggio to do differently if he wanted to secure the services of a coach employed by another educational institution?