Jury Instructions are given after

Closing Statements

Post$-$Trial Motions

the Jury's Verdict

Opening Statements

Jury Instructions are given after

Closing Statements

Post$-$Trial Motions

the Jury's Verdict

Opening Statements

Jury Instructions are given after

Closing Statements

Post$-$Trial Motions

the Jury's Verdict

Opening Statements

Jury Instructions are given after

Closing Statements

Post$-$Trial Motions

the Jury's Verdict

Opening Statements

Jury Instructions are given after

Closing Statements

Post$-$Trial Motions

the Jury's Verdict

Opening Statements

Jury Instructions are given after

Closing Statements

Post$-$Trial Motions

the Jury's Verdict

Opening Statements

Jury Instructions are given after

Closing Statements

Post$-$Trial Motions

the Jury's Verdict

Opening Statements

Scott has been arrested and is being tried for kidnapping. The State of Louisiana must find that Scott committed this crime by

a preponderance of the evidence

a simple majority of the jury

beyond a reasonable doubt

clear and convincing evidence

Scott has been arrested and is being tried for kidnapping. The State of Louisiana must find that Scott committed this crime by

a preponderance of the evidence

a simple majority of the jury

beyond a reasonable doubt

clear and convincing evidence

Scott has been arrested and is being tried for kidnapping. The State of Louisiana must find that Scott committed this crime by

a preponderance of the evidence

a simple majority of the jury

beyond a reasonable doubt

clear and convincing evidence

Scott has been arrested and is being tried for kidnapping. The State of Louisiana must find that Scott committed this crime by

a preponderance of the evidence

a simple majority of the jury

beyond a reasonable doubt

clear and convincing evidence

Scott has been arrested and is being tried for kidnapping. The State of Louisiana must find that Scott committed this crime by

a preponderance of the evidence

a simple majority of the jury

beyond a reasonable doubt

clear and convincing evidence

Tommy and Jessie are residents of Lafourche Parish. One night after leaving Rox's in downtown Thibodaux, Tommy crashes into Jessie's car because he was not paying attention. He did not intend to$.$ Thinking he can get more money in California, Jessie files a lawsuit for damages in San Francisco. The court

can hear the case via Zoom

must hear responsive pleadings

is the proper venue.

does not have jurisdiction.

Tommy and Jessie are residents of Lafourche Parish. One night after leaving Rox's in downtown Thibodaux, Tommy crashes into Jessie's car because he was not paying attention. He did not intend to$.$ Thinking he can get more money in California, Jessie files a lawsuit for damages in San Francisco. The court

can hear the case via Zoom

must hear responsive pleadings

is the proper venue.

does not have jurisdiction.

Tommy and Jessie are residents of Lafourche Parish. One night after leaving Rox's in downtown Thibodaux, Tommy crashes into Jessie's car because he was not paying attention. He did not intend to$.$ Thinking he can get more money in California, Jessie files a lawsuit for damages in San Francisco. The court

can hear the case via Zoom

must hear responsive pleadings

is the proper venue.

does not have jurisdiction.

Tommy and Jessie are residents of Lafourche Parish. One night after leaving Rox's in downtown Thibodaux, Tommy crashes into Jessie's car because he was not paying attention. He did not intend to$.$ Thinking he can get more money in California, Jessie files a lawsuit for damages in San Francisco. The court

can hear the case via Zoom

must hear responsive pleadings

is the proper venue.

does not have jurisdiction.

Julie is a resident of Arizona, and she files suit against Timmy in Mississippi. The dispute between the parties involves the use of intellectual property, which is governed by federal law. In order for this case to be heard in federal court:

the amount in controversy must be over $$75,000\mathrm{.}00$

Timmy must remain a citizen of anywhere but Arizona for the entirety of the case

Julie must remain a citizen of Arizona for the entirety of the case

nothing additional needs to take place. Under these facts, it will be heard in federal court.

Julie is a resident of Arizona, and she files suit against Timmy in Mississippi. The dispute between the parties involves the use of intellectual property, which is governed by federal law. In order for this case to be heard in federal court:

the amount in controversy must be over $$75,000\mathrm{.}00$

Timmy must remain a citizen of anywhere but Arizona for the entirety of the case

Julie must remain a citizen of Arizona for the entirety of the case

nothing additional needs to take place. Under these facts, it will be heard in federal court.

Cliff was working on a rig when he had a fall that caused a major head injury. His family sues his employer for negligence. As a medical doctor, Dr$.$ Royster specializes in traumatic brain injuries, and h