Justify your conclusions approach using CDC Study Guide Worksheet 5. Write 1-2 comprehensive paragraphs using your worksheet as a guide to describe how you will justify the conclusions of your evaluation.

TOPIC : Covid-19 vaccine uptake

Worksheet 5 - lustify Conclusions Question Response 1 Who will analyze the data (and who will coordinate this effort)? 2 How will data be analyzed and displayed? 3 Against what standards will you compare your interpretations in forming your judgments? 4 t Who will be involved in making interpretations and judgments and what process will be employed? 5 How will you deal with conflicting interpretations and judgments? 9 What are the limitations of your data analysis and interpretation process (e.g., potential biases, generalizability of results, reliability, validity)? Standards for Step 5: Justify Conclusions \begin{tabular}{|l|l|} \hline \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{ Qtandard } \\ \hline Utility & Questions and rationale used to interpret the findings? Have stakeholders considered different approaches for interpreting the findings? \\ \hline Feasibility & Is the approach to analysis and interpretation appropriate to the level of expertise and resources? \\ \hline Propriety & Have the standards and values of those less powerful or those most affected by the program been taken into account in determining standards for success? \\ \hline Accuracy & Can you explicitly justify your conclusions? Are the conclusions fully understandable to stakeholders? \\ \hline \end{tabular} Check data for errors. Consider issues of context when interpreting data. Assess results against available literature and results of similar programs. If multiple methods have been employed, compare different methods for consistency in findings. Consider alternative explanations. Use existing standards (e.g.. Healthy People 2010 objectives) as a starting point for comparisons. Compare program outcomes with those of previous years. Compare actual with intended outcomes. Document potential biases. Examine the limitations of the evaluation. Worksheet 5 - lustify Conclusions Question Response 1 Who will analyze the data (and who will coordinate this effort)? 2 How will data be analyzed and displayed? 3 Against what standards will you compare your interpretations in forming your judgments? 4 t Who will be involved in making interpretations and judgments and what process will be employed? 5 How will you deal with conflicting interpretations and judgments? 9 What are the limitations of your data analysis and interpretation process (e.g., potential biases, generalizability of results, reliability, validity)? Standards for Step 5: Justify Conclusions \begin{tabular}{|l|l|} \hline \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{ Qtandard } \\ \hline Utility & Questions and rationale used to interpret the findings? Have stakeholders considered different approaches for interpreting the findings? \\ \hline Feasibility & Is the approach to analysis and interpretation appropriate to the level of expertise and resources? \\ \hline Propriety & Have the standards and values of those less powerful or those most affected by the program been taken into account in determining standards for success? \\ \hline Accuracy & Can you explicitly justify your conclusions? Are the conclusions fully understandable to stakeholders? \\ \hline \end{tabular} Check data for errors. Consider issues of context when interpreting data. Assess results against available literature and results of similar programs. If multiple methods have been employed, compare different methods for consistency in findings. Consider alternative explanations. Use existing standards (e.g.. Healthy People 2010 objectives) as a starting point for comparisons. Compare program outcomes with those of previous years. Compare actual with intended outcomes. Document potential biases. Examine the limitations of the evaluation