Kate Goodman hatched a plan to develop digital teaching platform for music teachers. After sharing her idea with Nancy Dileo and Sue Rogers , a partnership was formed by the three of them. The partnership planned to provide online ensemble software that could weave together separate data streams for students in remote teaching environment that would produce a final product duplicating the sound of a choir singing together and would be paid for by subscription. Rogers initially loaned the partnership $18k and they all agreed to receive equal portions of the profits, after the repayment of the loan from Rogers. After several months, the partnership began to have problems. Rogers and Goodman told Dileo that she was no longer a partner and blocked her access to the partnership e-mail account. The partnership never made a profit so they dissolved it. While winding up the affairs of the partnership. Rogers assessed the value of partnerships limited assets and assumed ownership of the assets, since they were less than the loan she made to the partnership. Dileo sued Goodman and Rogers, stating that the partnership was wrongfully dissolved and that she was entitled to the damages. Was she correct?