Linear Programming is a better method to obtain for Aggregate Planning than Trial-and-Error but still not used as often. Which of the following is NOT a real reason for that? Question 1 options: LP can be more time consuming. Trial-and-Error solutions assure optimal solutions Expertise is limited in linear programming Expensive hardware and software Question 2 (1 point) Which of the following is a lot sizing technique that lets you produce any quantity that is needed? Question 2 options: O Minimum lot size O Lot-for-lot Lot size multiple Fixed order quantity