Lisa is looking back at her work from last year, when she allocated the company's key process costs to its three products. She knows that the company has historically used the NRV method to allocate joint costs. Unfortunately, the printout that she has of the final allocations and supporting detail is only partially legible. You see, Chris accidently set the sprinklers off in the office last week, and Lisa's printout was the recipient of most of that water. Here is a replication of what she could see from the printout; she noted missing information with lowercase roman numerals. 4 Units produced (available) at split-off point Sales value per unit at split-off point Units produced (available) after further processing Final sales value per unit after further processing Further processing costs Allocated joint costs Ah 408 $8 (i) $12 $2,700 (ii) Bay 204 $6 222 (iii) $660 $1,040 Say 408 $4 408 $10 (iv) $1,560 Total 1,020 (v) (vi) (vii) $5,100 $5,200

Fill in the missing details for each product. Lisa is looking back at her work from last year, when she allocated the company's key process costs to its three products. She knows that the company has historically used the NRV method to allocate joint costs. Unfortunately, the printout that she has of the final allocations and supporting detail is only partially legible. You see, Chris accidently set the sprinklers off in the office last week, and Lisa's printout was the recipient of most of that water. Here is a replication of what she could see from the printout; she noted missing information with lowercase roman numerals. 58 56 545 (4) 222 40e m $125 (14) $10 $600 5 (n) $5,100 $2,700 $1,040 $1.560 55.200 eTextbook and Media pount Sales value per unit at 58 56 545 split-oft point Units produced atter further 222 406 procesuing Finsl sales value per unit after $12 5 5105 lurther processing Further procestine $2,700 $660 5 31040 51.560 Nlocated pint cests ne. eTextbook and Media Artemptu oof zused