Luis is a third grade student that has received ELL services for two years. His teacher is concerned that he is not making adequate academic progress. He often asks for things to be translated to his native language so he can complete the assignment. Luis was referred and tested for a learning disability. After reviewing the academic data, observation notes, and test scores, the case conference committee determined that Luis qualified as a student with a specific learning disability. The special education teacher disagreed and wrote a dissenting opinion stating that Luis had been wrongly identified. Was Indiana law broken?