Make a correct response for the initial postings below

make a short response

Available resources from textbook:-

MGMT 1209 Fall 2022 Instructor: Mgmt 1209 Fanshawe Business Ethics Now 6th Edition Author: Andrew Ghillyer ISBN: 1260414078

requirements:- Response postings should consist of a thoughtful commentary on the perspectives and observations included in the initial posting you are commenting on. For example, you might state whether you agree or disagree with the point made in the initial posting and explain why. You might also comment on content you found particularly interesting or thought-provoking and extend the conversation" by adding additional commentary or asking a question.

Post 1

Ques 2. What should it have done differently?

Ans2. Monsanto shouldn't have endeavored to sell the items one next to the other. All things being equal, the items ought to have been publicized independently. One of the main interesting points is client insight, which is framed through notices, virtual entertainment, and so forth. The weed killer ought to have been promoted. Then in a couple of months or weeks, the wheat ought to have been publicized. Along these lines, the items don't appear to be firmly associated, even though they are having a similar dynamic fixing. Or then again in different terms, Selling merchandise next to each other shouldn't have been attempted by Monsanto. The merchandise ought to rather have been delivered all alone. One of the most basic interesting points is the impression of our shoppers, made by promoting, online entertainment, and so forth. The enemy of the weeds ought to be proclaimed. The wheat ought to have been uncovered in a couple of months or weeks. The products don't anyway appear to be firmly connected, even though they share a similar dynamic part.

Ques3.Was it ethical for Monsanto to settle the litigation with no admission of responsibility or commitment to change any internal practices? why or why not?

Ans3. I do accept settling the case in light of multiple factors was the right decision. Monsanto understood barely 10 years prior that the seeds (counting the combo with the weed killer) got a negative response from the market and zeroed in on different items. It had no aim of selling wheat seeds. There was no notice of any inside issues other than the wheat strain expressed. Accordingly, there were no main issues with their ongoing items that should have been adjusted or stopped. Settling delineated to general society and ranchers that the exorbitant interruption was sad yet important and it was their approach to making things right. This is likewise a type of common agreement approach where organizations put the requirements/interests of shoppers and ranchers over investors. Taking a gander at another point of view, it may not be no doubt trustworthy on the off chance that the organization just made sense of the strain was disposed of.

Ques 4. Did Japan make the right decision when it banned all imports of U.S. soft wheat?

Ans4.Japan restricted U.S. delicate wheat in April 2013 and Japan did this since it was established that there were hereditarily further developed wheat crops that were found because of which Japan dropped the request for 27,500 tons of wheat. Besides, with this choice, Japan endured a ton as far as a benefit through the economy since residents of Japan where more than the routine of consuming wheat from the US however then again Japan pursued sure that this choice ought to get their kin as allowing individuals to consume the delicate wheat from the U.S. can prompt effect of the wellbeing of individuals in Japan negatively. Besides, the wheat crop was found to develop like a weed which make Japan ponder managing U.S. Thus, in all one might say that Japan represented its kin and for this individuals of Japan likewise upheld its country as they saw the nation taking inclination of its kin as opposed to blasting the import business. For a similar reason, individuals likewise started zeroing in on neighborhood wheat items which additionally propelled individuals the assembling wheat. Additionally, individuals got to realize that it is smarter to consume the wheat from the yields they have developed themselves and this likewise supported the economy in the agribusiness region. Moreover, the choice of Japan of inspiring wheat import from the U.S. was made right into it in August 2013, and in this length of few months, Japanese individuals were more engaged in the development of their own country.

Ques5. Food scientists argue that Mother Nature has been genetically modifying plant species for thousands of years and that technology now allows them to do the same for the welfare of a global population. Explain the ethical position of this argument.

Ans5. The interpretation of this argument is that there is one crucial area to which attention should be paid: conservation. When I use the word "conservation," I mean both the protection of the population and guaranteeing its welfare. Given that food is a natural necessity for human survival, moral behavior in response to this reality would dictate that to protect and conserve the human through food provision, methods of guaranteeing that there is a plentiful supply of food are seen to be of moral concern to others. Therefore, it implies that morality requires us to consider how to take care of ourselves while also taking care of others, which is a humanitarian purpose.

Post 2

9. Because Innocence Is Sexier Than You Think "Love's Baby Soft" "Because innocence is sexier than you think", adding a photo of a child (a girl) promoting lipstick. I don't think that the photo of the girl should be an object of lust, as others could think. What it's wrong with this ad is the way they sell and imply that the girl is trying to be "sexy" using lipstick. This brainwashes people's perceptions and ideas that every girl that is using lipstick is trying to be sexy and probably trying to gain someone's attention. Without a doubt, my perspective in being guided by the theory of "Virtue Ethics", which states that people live their lives usually based on ideals that match their commitment to achieving their own goals (Ghillyer, 2021, p.

6). These ads were changed because as a society, we see it as "inappropriate" that kids are being represented as objects of lust. Many people relate the idea of using lipstick as a bad thing, which is not. It's the perception and correlation that is wrong. 8. Show Her It's A Man's World In this ad, we can see a man literally on the bed, while I suppose the wife, is on her knees giving him the dinner for that night. It's presented that the woman does not have any importance being treated as a slave, while the man is shown as the "owner". The ethical violation would be the sense of "superiority" from the man toward the woman. I would say that the ethic theory guiding my perspective is the Virtue of Ethics, being the value that I'm committed to as equity. Things have changed because women started to have more participation in the workplace, reclaiming and earning more respect. 15. More Doctors Smoke Camels #2 The ad pictures a "doctor" smoking a specific cigarette. Additionally, it's stated that most doctors smoke the promoted brand. In short words, there's no morality behind it. They are promoting doctors, a profession that conveys years of research and study is encouraging to smoke, which it's common knowledge that it's not very beneficial for health. In my opinion, the ethical theory used in this would be Utilitarianism, based on ethical choices that offer the greatest good for the greatest amount of people (Ghillyer, 2021, p.

7). I'm thinking about what's best for the greater number of people will be. Is it promoting doctors smoking the greatest good for the greatest number of people? In the end, these ads are not being promoted anymore because research and studies have proved that smoking will eventually kill you. It's not the best idea to market professionals that should be helping others to live longer, doing something contradictory to their means.

9. That's What Wives Are For! It's been promoted as a mixer, used generally to make cakes. The company is objecting that women are only valuable for their culinary activities, nothing more. It's been praised that men can buy these machines as gifts to their wives, having in mind that that's the only thing that they can do. The ad is objects that women can't achieve anything more because they are focused on cooking. According to Ghillyer (2021, p.7), the universal ethics theory is based on the that everyone should have and follow universal principles that are needed to be applied in every situation. In this case, the universal ethic that should be applied to everyone is equity. All these misogynistic ads have not been very popular several years ago considering that women have more participation in the market and the workplace as well, reclaiming more respect and participation.

3. Doesn't Your Mama Wash You with Fairy Soap? Trying to promote a white soup, this ad violates others' differences. It's implying that with the soup is possible to change other's skin tones with a bath. Pure racism. What it's even worse, they involve two kids in it. Probably my perspective is guided by the Universal Ethics theory as well, in which I believe that we shouldn't be treated as alienated because we are from different cultures or countries. I could say that I also follow this example "The Golden Rule", do unto others as you would have them do unto you (Ghillyer, 2021, p. 6). The change in perspective that being physically different does not mean that people should change to fit in certain standards. Nowadays there's more interaction between cultures, leading to more diversification. Ghillyer, A. W. (2021). Business ethics now (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education