Make any assumptions as needed but make sure you clearly state them in your answer. For ease of reference, the questions are appended below: Chapter 17 PE= 17. MM proposition 2* Archimedes Levers is financed by a mixture of debt and equity. You have the following information about its cost of capital: PD = 12% PA= Be= 1.5 Bp = BA= D/V = 0.5 Can you fill in the blanks? 17= 10% m= 18% 24. Investor choice People often convey the idea behind MM's proposition 1 by various supermarket analogies, for example, "The value of a pie should not depend on how it is sliced," or, "The cost of a whole chicken should equal the cost of assembling one by buying two drumsticks, two wings, two breasts, and so on." Actually proposition 1 doesn't work in the supermarket. You'll pay less for an uncut whole pie than for a pie assembled from pieces purchased separately. Supermarkets charge more for chickens after they are cut up. Why? What costs or imperfections cause proposition 1 to fail in the supermarket? Are these costs or imperfections likely to be important for corporations issuing securities on the U.S. or world capital markets? Explain