Question: Match each concept to its most correct definition or example. Each concept will have only one correct match. Question 18 options: Suppression of defendant-favorable evidence
Match each concept to its most correct definition or example. Each concept will have only one correct match.
Question 18 options:
Suppression of defendant-favorable evidence by the prosecution violates due process when material to guilt or punishment, whether in good or bad faith
Right that, if not affirmatively exercised by the defendant in the first instance, can become hard to assert on appeal
Admissibility of evidence gained through questioning of suspects
Established the modern form of the exclusionary rule
Availability of this exception to Miranda does not depend on the officer's subjective mindset at the time of questioning
Standard of proof often required for warrant exceptions to apply
Standard of proof required to extend a traffic stop beyond the initial purposes of the stop
Right that is fundamental enough that it does not require affirmative exercise in the first instance
Allowed for brief investigative stops by law enforcement for officer and public safety purposes
Process in which attorneys and judges question potential juror about suitability to sit on the jury
1. Speedy trial
2. Self-incrimination protection
3. Public safety
4. Probable cause
5. Reasonable suspicion
6. Voir dire
7. Brady v. Maryland
8. Terry v. Ohio
9. Mapp v. Ohio
10. Miranda v. Arizona
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
